TheCircuitMojoHD asked:
Fascinating interview with Michio Kaku. Speaking about his new book “Physics of the Impossible,” Dr. Kaku explains with how Physics one day may allow us to go back in time. Humorous, enlightening, and thought provoking. Amazing.
Caffeinated Content
#1 by rothkyl10 on 2009/12/20 - 11:01 pm
Quote
how do you know He doesn’t exist? atheists are just as lame as christians. they both make up their own beliefs and call the others stupid for not believing what they believe
#2 by sapzap96 on 2009/12/22 - 5:29 am
Quote
But the Bible is a 2000 year old fairytale book!!! Judgement Day, God, Hell, all of these were made by prehistoric men.
#3 by WerewolfOfTheWater on 2009/12/22 - 1:05 pm
Quote
What’s the matter, all the big words too confusing for your tiny brain, so instead of understanding science you opt to cling to bronze age myths? Poor little kid.
#4 by WerewolfOfTheWater on 2009/12/24 - 4:38 pm
Quote
The Bible says nothing about computers either, you fucking idiot, and yet here you are.
#5 by ShyDream3r on 2009/12/27 - 3:42 pm
Quote
Michio Kaku makes me want to read a book again lol [=
#6 by LostReality33 on 2009/12/30 - 11:23 pm
Quote
Religion=Blind Obedience. God doesn’t even exist. You should OPEN YOUR EYES.
#7 by LostReality33 on 2010/01/01 - 1:25 pm
Quote
he’s talking about back to the future you fucking retard! terminator…terminator my dick hole
#8 by Jason442200 on 2010/01/04 - 11:41 am
Quote
Just like the word of god saying I’m dead?? Nice try Andre you nazie loser. Thats right, AndreHiltre is a nazie supporter, so how in the love of crap can anyone take him seriously??
#9 by LokiFreign on 2010/01/06 - 4:46 pm
Quote
HAHAHAHAHAHA
my pitchfork awaits your prideful ass, Hiltre; you think the Lord is not aware of your lies and hubris? HAAAAHAHAHA.
Be seeing you!
#10 by Jason442200 on 2010/01/06 - 11:34 pm
Quote
AndreHiltre is the BS one here, I was suposed to be begging him for forgivness within 10 days because I badmouthed his “god” and that he has direct communication to “god” yet over 2 weeks later I’m doin fine. Whats worse is that I updated him on my well being on his youtube page and called him a false prophet…..so what does he do? Block all my comments and say that I sent him an email begging for forgivness……what a weak atempt to manipulate the masses without proof.
Peace
#11 by CYSapphiro on 2010/01/08 - 8:23 am
Quote
AndreHiltre, I think you’re the one bullshitting here, no offence, but if you’re religious, I think you should just avoid watching scientific videos. :]
Did your book even know the world wasn’t flat? How about the billions of planets and galaxies out there, are they stated in your holy book? How about F=M*A? ._.”
#12 by AndreHiltre on 2010/01/09 - 10:04 am
Quote
This is the biggest load of blasphemous bull shit I’ve ever heard. The Bible says nothing about time travel and all this space crap. The only fact these idiots need know is that Judgement Day will see them burning in hell if they do not embrace the Word of God.
#13 by jpocali on 2010/01/11 - 3:48 pm
Quote
He starts talking about time travel, but by the end of the conversation he is talking about dimension travel. I honestly believe that fractal geometry will help lead us to the latter.
#14 by Atheistx82 on 2010/01/14 - 3:40 pm
Quote
He gets a free pass because he’s good at math, but often the math has no solid foundation. Often there’s no justification for the starting point, but the math that follows from there is good, then there’s no justification for the ridiculous extrapolations drawn at the end.
White Holes? Time Travel? Parallel Worlds? Kaku is the King of Woo on these issues, and he should be asked hard question, but he gets a free pass because he’s good at math.
#15 by DerbyStarz on 2010/01/15 - 11:05 am
Quote
If we do create a time machine in the future they will not be able to go into the past because the machine was never made in the past so how can you go into the past when it was never invented then. into the future you can because it is already invented but u cant not go back past the date the machine was made
#16 by idotechno on 2010/01/18 - 7:38 am
Quote
There is only one instant in time. and that instant is the “right now”. everything else is just information and potential information.
#17 by ponkadolz on 2010/01/19 - 7:40 pm
Quote
watch?v=X02WMNoHSm8
i posted links there, feel free to read them if you have the time… ;)
#18 by dasgroover on 2010/01/20 - 1:22 am
Quote
the field is the important factor
not the dots
#19 by dasgroover on 2010/01/22 - 12:33 am
Quote
if nothing unreal exists
and time is only a psychological construct
it is easier – and to resolve the irreconcilable – that the ‘theory’ of time cannot :
time does not flow, consciousness flows
time does not ‘extend’ anywhere -
consciousness extends everywhere
#20 by ponkadolz on 2010/01/22 - 6:40 am
Quote
One would seem to
have to appeal to the notion of a higher-dimensional time, one which
records the passing of time of the ULOT. But then this higher-dimensional
time would also require its own higher-dimensional time, creating a chain of
higher-dimensional time-dimensions seemingly extending to infinity.
- K. J, Strommen, et. al.
sorry for the long post, i would have posted a link instead but people might get tired of reading a long article so i just posted some important parts. ;)
#21 by ponkadolz on 2010/01/25 - 1:51 am
Quote
Yet this is in reference to time itself. Time itself
would be undergoing change. But time by its very nature measures change;
change is actually nothing but a recognition of the passing of time. Nothing
changes without time having passed. So what possible sense could one
make of time itself changing? Time itself would have to experience a
passage through time, which appears patently absurd!
#22 by ponkadolz on 2010/01/27 - 5:29 am
Quote
The answer, in fact, seems to be a resounding no! The reason for this can
be found by simply considering what time “flowing” could mean in a
physical sense. “Flow” implies that some sort of change is occurring, that
there is a change in time which results in “now” becoming “then,” the
present becoming the past and the future becoming the present. There is a
direct implication of some form of motion, or at least change, in the very
concept of time flowing.
#23 by ponkadolz on 2010/01/30 - 4:57 am
Quote
The very
fact that we observe motion indicates a passage of time, and that we are
flowing down the river of time, carried along by its steady flow, from the
past to the future, our own position at all points representing the “present.”
Few if any would deny that this is what we feel to be true, and an essential
part of life. However, could our intuition be fooling us? Does the concept of
a flow of time make sense?
#24 by ponkadolz on 2010/02/01 - 4:36 am
Quote
There is one aspect of time which is so entrenched in our lives, so
intuitively true that we rarely if ever question it or even think about it,
even in discussions on time-travel and the like. That aspect is what is
commonly dubbed the “flow” of time, and is the observation that we seem to be
inexorably and unceasingly moving from the past to the future.